![]() So, what do you guys think? Are there any mods to fix this? Exspecially one that gives the byzantines a proper frontier on the danube. Like the original Medieval: Total War, it focuses on medieval warfare, religion and politics in Europe, North Africa. Overall I have found that the shapes of the regions is not proper for representing byzantine history. Medieval II: Total War, the indirect sequel to 2002's Medieval: Total War and the fourth game in the Total War series from The Creative Assembly, is a game of turn-based strategic rounds and real-time tactically-oriented battles. And seriously? Only a small church in Constantinople? WHAT THE ♥♥♥♥!!!! Did someone forget to tell the developers about the Hagia Sophia? Anyways, I also think there should also be a Nicomdeia region because that city was very important at the time, and was one of the few cities in asia minor that the byzantines managed to hold on to. ![]() It definitley should be a huge city not just large. One thing that annoyed me is Constantinople is WAYYYYYYY to small and weak to be realistic. Second Durrazo Should be held by the Byzantines as it remained part of the empire.Another issue is that Nicaea should not be held by the empire as a history book SPECIFICALLY said that the city fell to the turks in 1078. One thing is that the empire dosen't start with its danubian frontier, which it managed to hold on to despite the loss of asia minor. Ive done the byzantine campaign and found it historiacally inacurrate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |